I’ve been following this story since I heard about it a couple of days ago, waiting to see how it played out. It seemed to outrageous to warrant an immediate action. Now that it’s had time to simmer (and boil over), it seems like we’ve arrived at an appropriate time to comment.
Please see this good quick ‘n’ dirty summary post with relevant links at your favorite econoblog, Naked Capitalism. Politico has all the juicy parts.
I feel Edward Harrison is being a smidge unfair. If I can go to cafepress.com and spend $30 to have a photoshopped image of me and Gandhi tandem-JetSkiing emblazoned on a tee shirt, why can’t I pay spend a few thousands dollars for the Washington Post to customize an news article or editorial to depict an event of comparable accuracy to me and my boy Gandhi enjoying summer at the lake?
Harrison and those blabbermouth, self-righteous health care lobbyists are such prudes.
… and the cow goes moo
Just light one up!
Or says the BBC:
“The authorities in Gong’an county had told civil servants and teachers to smoke 230,000 packs of the locally-made Hubei brand each year.
Those who did not smoke enough or used brands from other provinces or overseas faced being fined or even fired.”
Awesome!
… and the cow goes moo
NYT a bit late to recognize that voiding Ted Stevens’ conviction had nothing to do with his alleged crimes
April 12, 2009
Well, well, well.
I posted about this minor issue a few days back, but it seems the old grey lady has come around to agreeing with me.
The New York Times has an article expressing the views of numerous sources that would concur with my opinion that the evidence was enough to convict former Alaskan SuperSenator Ted Stevens, but the trial was ravaged from within by prosecutorial incompetence.
Colleen Walsh, one of the jurors who convicted Mr. Stevens, said on her personal blog of the trial’s collapse, “The only thing this proves is that the prosecution messed everything up.”
Ms. Walsh, a church secretary, wrote on the blog as if speaking to Mr. Stevens, saying: “You may be innocent on corruption charges which were never brought up. But you are still guilty of not disclosing some of your major gifts to the public.”
I fear much of this will be long forgotten in a few months or years and Mr. Stevens might regain his Senate seat as a result, once again able to distribute taxpayer funds to those who buy him fancy things. Without repercussion, of course. It took the Public Integrity Section 40 years to catch on to him this time around (and only a few months to set to fire all they had collected), and I doubt Mr. Stevens will live to perpetrate his particular brand of mean corruption to allow the PIS to accumulate another 40 years of evidence to use against him.
… and the cow goes moo
I called it! Ted Stevens conviction might be voided!
April 2, 2009
This is a bittersweet personal victory for me. Kinda sucks when your cynicism is proven apt.
For background on some of the ridiculousness that has transpired during the trial (and if it takes decades to gather enough evidence to prosecute a dim-witted loudmouth Senator for corruption, should we expect anything other than breathtaking incompetence from the prosecution?) please see a post about Ted Steven’s ex-BFF Bill Allen, the prosecution’s key witness, here.
An update, including some “I dare you to call me on my bullshit” testimony from Mrs. Catherine Stevens, Ted’s wife, can be found here.
My own personal congratulations (a bit premature, perhaps, but still appropriate) for Mr. Stevens’ acquittal from October can be found here (God bless the internet and self-serving personal blogging. Proof that I was right, recorded for posterity.)
I celebrate his late-October conviction here, as well as mentioning the likelihood of successful appeal.
One incidence of ridiculousness at the trial can be found here (a new juror was needed to replace a Ms. Marian Hinnant who just had to watch the Breeders’ Cup during deliberation. And who lied about her dad dying so that she could do so. Fishy. I’d like to see some before and after photos of her house, pre- and post-trial).
And here’s a re-cap of some of the oddities and prosecutorial blunders, including the sexy sexy revelation that perhaps a female FBI agent was getting all hot and bothered for star witness and apparent sex god, ‘Big’ Bill Allen. Re-capping my favorite quote from FBI Agent Chad Joy, who is central to the allegations of misconduct by the prosecution (I’d also like to see a before and after photo of his house, not that I doubt the validity of his claims, just the motivations):
“Mr. Joy said his colleague, Mary Beth Kepner, almost always wore pants but on the day the witness, Bill Allen, took the stand, Ms. Kepner donned a skirt, which Mr. Joy said she described as “a present” to Mr. Allen.
…
In its court filing, Mr. Stevens’s defense team has magnified Mr. Joy’s complaint about an improper relationship between Ms. Kepner and Mr. Allen, asserting that they appeared to have had a sexual relationship. Mr. Joy did not raise that possibility in the redacted version of his statement, but did say Ms. Kepner had improperly gone alone to Mr. Allen’s hotel room.”
Bow-chika-wow-wow.
And here’s what you’ve all been waiting for… The New York Times today reports that the Justice Department is now looking to void Teddy’s conviction!
“The Justice Department moved on Wednesday to drop all charges against former Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska, who lost his seat last year just days after being convicted on seven felony counts of ethics violations.”
Congratulation, Ted Stevens! Due to massive incompetence by prosecutor Brenda K. Morris, among others, and the irresistible sexiness of star witness, Bill Allen, as well as what must be by-design universal retardation at the special ed section of the Justice Department (the Public Integrity Section), you will probably live to 120 as a free man rather than see a day of prison. And you probably have a fair chance at re-election in the asshole-of-a-state, Alaska, in 2012, at age 88.
Who else thinks that perhaps the Public Integrity Section’s staffing and funding is influenced by the very people they are meant to police? I cna’t imagine why the department might be designed in manner that would allow it to do its job without impedance from the powerful members of Congress it is likely to investigate. There’s no reason why anyone in power would want the dirty laundry aired.
… and the cow goes moo